dull moment
This is the comment in reply to Demian post in lj but as has been long, leisurely way to 40 comments and get cocky here.
Ignorance is the reason why Creative Commons are so widespread and every day. Every day there are more kids and chavalas mindless, amateur abnormal ex-Bitra cloning which point to these and they exhibit proudly stamp in DC because his work is copyrighted so no one can accuse them of anything or steal. What to expect when in their own schools, colleges and universities, we are the DC as the "Internet copyright? For something they learn in the classroom, you can not ask you to realize that it is wrong.
course, all this comes from beyond the CC, the clones, the deviants and the Internet in general. Specifically comes from total ignorance about what is really the copyright. "Copyright" is easy to learn and repeat but when we understand the expression drained from the hands. The idea of the birth of copyright is based on the simple and ancient law summarized in the following sentence: "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's." That is nothing to say that yours is yours and must be for you as well as all closely related to it.
ironic how people think that the "copyright" is so that others do not "steal" the idea. Ironic and stupid, like the whole issue of patents of inventions and scientific findings are but another form of copyright. It reminds me of the history of radio, for example, who invented the radio? Marconi say (the increasingly few) people who are around the world, if you even say in the collection of "Once Upon once ... Inventors! "Actually Marconi was only the first to set and implement a principle discovered by James Maxwell in 1865 and beyond then validated by Rudolf Hertz in 1886 (I think, do not make me put my hand in the fire that all this will memory). With these two bases Marconi was by no means the only one to start testing with that principle until he found the radio, so if it was, however, was to be the first to claim the lovely and well-known patent 1896. The greatest grace is that many countries did not accept that patent initially why? For a year before a man named Alexander Popov had created a radio wave receiver and a few months before Marconi submit its Popov had already done radio shows with his invention.
radio has not only funny story about his invention, the phone also has it and in fact to anyone reading the newspapers may recall that since 2002 the inventor of this ingenious device is not considered and if Graham Bell Antonio Meucci ( who called the invention teletrofono by the way). Graham Bell's friend was simply the first to sign for the patent, Meucci 5 years before failed to do so by, Hang on, economic hardship and children is that copyrights and patents are charged and if you do not give a good indication of your invention or creation send you to hell.
And not just there, no sir. The bulb! This pileup of anyone ever is agreed until all is melted and used in jokes to point out the invalidity of others for being unable to put it. This invention is always attributed to Thomas Edison really should belong to Heinrich Göbel that years before Edison's idea was crossed by the head (especially 30 years) and sold lamps light bulb that blew with your watch in Germany with the cuckoo clocks. And in the end since the friend Göbel sell their bulbs to when Edison bought the patent delicious and succulent up to 5 inventors are known to have built and used light bulbs in their laboratories. The
chip! Nobody knows who invented it but many attribute it to Jack Kilby (1958), but in 1949 Werner Jacobi had already filled a patent application for its chip, unfortunately it was reported and his name remains a trivial anecdote while the chip is not has "official inventor." The toaster! In 1909 a company, General Electric, launched a toaster patented as D-12 (or 11 or something asin) but in 1905 the Pacific Electric Heating Company had already launched and sold toasters at close range. The telegraph! Created by Samuel Morse (hence the Morse language) in 1833, NO! Gauss and Weber in 1822 and used a telegraph to communicate from their offices (which does not know who is Gaussian and is of Mammals that shot from sticking YA). The tamagotchi! Created in 1996 by Aki Maita right? Then someone explain to me the tamagotchi that I bought at the Expo 1992 brand Kyosho. And so to a hundred more and the rest is because we do not know that the day that the lord or lady went for the patent was behind him in the queue had exactly the same invention to present.
"Graham Bell stole phone idea? Did Edison made the light bulb? Perhaps the respected Marconi spent a day in the laboratory of Popov and the pileup molo you had there and said "my pa? No. Because they created these inventions actually worked on them with zeal, investigated and ruled much or more than Meucci, Göbel and Popov, global perspective were not the first, the first really were others who simply did not sign because they could not patent for lack of money or because they (and many gave this reason) the invention must be "World Heritage" in other words that we were all owners thereof. Individual perspective but the fact was that neither Graham Bell, and Edison, and Marconi had because they know that this idea of a winter night had already been made, indeed rather normal thing is not knowing that had already been done. With all that said back to the copyright and "copyright", as we have seen how to "avoid you steal the idea "is kinda stupid, can not be her goal. Simply because at this moment at least two people in the world have the same idea and decided to make, and we are many people in the world as to only be two. So no, definitely intellectual property theft can not be, then why? Actually the thing is simple to understand if one thinks of the inventors and writers of yore back when copyrights and patents began to be used. They were simple people, locked up day and night in their offices or research labs to find a new invention, why the love of art? No. If you do not because that was what they fed their families. So is, the "copyright" was a government aid for people who did something "for the benefit of mankind ', facilitating communications, life in general or even recreational activities. It was a monetary payment, set and concrete was done each time had an invention. It was not until later when the experiments and other vicissitudes of fate left to the wives and families of these inventors and researchers widows and orphans with no other support which extended the copyright to the immediate family had an income until the greatest had sons or daughters work (in the case of families without sons) had been married. not trying to say "This I I created "or" this is mine ", or even the" Look, cool things I do and you can not do anything like that or I denounce you for violating my copyright. "It was a job, a way as any other support a family. When and why the idea degraded to the point that today there are families named Bell sticking by the "copyright" the phone claiming to be direct descendants, I do not know. Surely the time matches the to be "normal" and "as God saw fit to make" began to be frowned upon and they began to seek models of beauty icons. Or when you have money went "to feed the children" and sometimes "give a good education children "to" to get more cool stuff 8D.
At least before it was only a matter of money. How it all today. "mighty gentleman is Don Money" Quevedo said since then, and certainly many before He thought the same. Basically since the invention of property have always wanted to have more and more, only that since money was invented and allowed the tradeoffs are more blinkered. Instead of wanting: more goats, more pigs, more straw more chickens, more cows, more horses, more garden, more seeds, more stones, more mirrors, more material, more shoes ... We will want: more money.
But as we have shown a thousand and one times (and we stay until this planetucho pop or send us to hell, whichever comes first) things can always get worse. And with the emergence of the network was aware of it, because it already existed before that to put a sticker with your name to something you've done or written and claim it as yours and only yours and do anything like that violated your "copyright "What happens is that before the ordinary people did not know how to claim them except with tantrums and between that neighbor and the neighbor was quiet because I thought you were goat of the Pyrenees which the thing was not noticeable. But now with the Internet it is hard not to notice. More so since some son of a bitch to he felt that there was little drama on the Internet decided to create the Creative Commons and allow people to say that it was "Internet copyright." Now is not the ordinary people know and claim to have "something" that shield, is that even people without heads know and actually use more than ordinary people because these understand that CC is actually .
And so, the copyright went from being an aid to inventors who devoted their time to help humanity, to be a reward to the families of these by years of hunger and reforms to the explosions of the laboratory, to be a fixed money supply in the economy from the descendants of those inventors who have clear or who are descendants of this and not an immigrant who changed his name to the hype, to be ... Something that people dead souls and lives are insubstantial illusions of being someone because they have something that you have the copyright and if it is copied, removed or show around, they are stealing and may protest and so prove to be the more better for having done that to what they have been copyrighted. Survival of the question about money and about money a. .. Matter of ignorance.
To think they originally spent time expired patents and invention going to be "world heritage" that is "owned by all" and there is now a breeding idiot out there (like so many) fan to copy others putting Creative Commons in everything he does and saying you do not copy to anyone unless they copy it to her because she has the CC and the other not ...
"And so ignorance gave birth to the child resulting from her relationship with stupidity and called it humanity.
-me feel proud, my daughter."
0 comments:
Post a Comment